National Council of Educational Research and Training has come up
with
The checked OMRs of NTSE Stage
II (SAT, MAT & LCT)
aspirants can check their OMRs on
In case you find any
inconsistency then you are advised to report the same to the division through
Email at ntsexam.ncert@gov.in by August 20th 2017 till 5.30 PM
now they have excluded seven questions from scoring (two in MAT & five in SAT)
so the final merit will be made out of 143
expected cut off can be 82-83
so the final merit will be made out of 143
expected cut off can be 82-83
ANNOUNCEMENTS | ||
 | NTS Stage-II Examination Provisional Result - 2017  | |
Sir after the final scoring keys released what may be the cutoff?
ReplyDeletewe have to wait for the final answer key
ReplyDeleteSir, Are the seats doubled?
ReplyDeleteNot yet, still its 1000 only
DeleteSir OMR show nhi ho raha h kya process h. Please
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSorry dear,
ReplyDeletechecked OMRs has lots of discrepancies. When many students applied their roll number, they found that MAT OMR displayed was their's but SAT OMR was of some other student. Seems because of this blunder NCERT was forced to withdraw the OMRs. Will inform through my blog as soon as the OMRs are displayed again
Good evening sir! I am a student from Allen career institute. Considering marks of students from Allen what can be the expected cut off this year .is 90-100 marks a safe range
ReplyDelete90-100, I am very much sure about your selection
DeleteThanks,😁sir I hope your words come true😇
DeleteGood morning sir
ReplyDeleteMy son's marks are
82.66 what are the chances of being selected.Please reply
Sir,
DeleteI am expecting a cut off of 82-83
82.66, I think the kid will make it to top 1000
I still have objections on the SAT answer key
ReplyDeleteQ. No.72 (SAT)
Observation/Feed - Answer given in the official answer key is 4 i.e. Both statements are true and Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. The correct answer should be 3
Brief Description of supporting facts/evidence/explanation - Page No. 32 of Class X History book, Chapter - 'The Rise of Nationalism in Indo-China' says - The French began by building canals and draining lands in the Mekong delta to increase cultivation. The vast system of irrigation works – canals and earthworks – built mainly with forced labour, increased rice production and allowed the export of rice to the international market. Vietnam exported two-thirds of its rice production and by 1931 had become the third largest exporter of rice in the world.
Q. No.87 (SAT)
Observation/Feed - This Question should be declared as BONUS or exempted from the final evaluation
Brief Description of supporting facts/evidence/explanation - Page No. 16, Civics book, Chapter Federalism clearly says ''The Constitution declared India as Union of States" but the answer declares India as a federation. India has features of Quasi-federal structure, but we cannot term India as a federal state. In India the center has clearly advantages over states - Union list has more subjects of national importance, in concurrent list Constitution gives more power to the centre, in India we have single citizenship only, emergency powers clearly gives advantage to the centre.
In State of West Bengal v Union of India, the apex court held that decentralization of authority in India was primarily to facilitate smooth governance of a large nation and therefore, it contains many centralizing features also. Indian Constitution is not a ‘traditional federal constitution.’ In S.R. Bommai v Union of India, Justice Ahmadi opined that the essence of federation is the existence of distribution of power between the Union and the States. However, the absence of the terms ‘federal’ or ‘federation’ and the presence of unitary features such as residuary powers, single citizenship, integrated judiciary, etc can help us conclude that the Constitution of India is more ‘quasi federal’ than ‘federal’ or ‘unitary’. Similar was held in the case of Sat Pal v State of Punjab.
The Chairman of Drafting Committee, Dr. Ambedkar had thus rightly said that, “Our Constitution would be both unitary as well as federal according to the requirements of time and circumstances”. The Drafting Committee wanted to clarify that though India was a federation, it was not the result of any voluntary agreement between the States. Though the country is divided into many States, it is basically for administrative purposes which do not in any way affect its functioning as an integrated unit.
Finally, on a careful analysis of the federal and unitary features of the constitution, this aspect is not hard to miss that in every federal feature, there was an ultimate centralizing force which is existing. Therefore, it would not be wrong to conclude that the Constitution of India is federal in structure and unitary in spirit i.e. it is quasi- federal in nature.
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/quasi-federal-nature-of-indian-constitution-2245-1.html