Case Study - Mexico Olympics
Two African-American athletes, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, won the gold and bronze medal respectively in the 200 mt. race. For the medal ceremony, both of them wore no shoes and stood in their black socks. They were representing Black poverty, and racial discrimination against them in the USA. They also raised black-gloved clenched fists to symbolise Black Power. The athlete from Australia, Peter Norman, who won the silver medal, wore a human rights badge to declare his support to the two Americans.
The result of their actions- The Olympic Committee took back their medals for making a political statement and thus violating the Olympic spirit.
When they returned to USA, they had to face public criticism.
Peter Norman was also penalised by not being included in the next Olympic.
Origin of Social Differences
(i) Most of the social differences are not of our own making, they are based on an accident of birth. Our race, our colour, our religion, our gender or country of birth, are not chosen by us.
(ii) But some social differences are made by us only by choice. For example -
(i) Non-belief in God, or to follow a different religion, (ii) where and what to study, (iii) which profession to follow (iv) also choose the games or cultural activities we want to follow, etc.
Our choices lead to the formation of social groups.
(iii) It is not necessary that all social differences should lead to social divisions. People belonging to different social groups share differences and similarities, which cut across all political boundaries.
Important : If religion creates similarities, it can divide people over the issue of caste or sect (Catholic or Protestant, Brahmin or Scheduled Caste).
Rich and poor persons in the same family differ from each other and lack closeness to each other, for they feel they are different.
Overlapping and Cross-Cutting Differences
Why was there a social division in USA?
There was a division between the Whites and Blacks in USA because the Blacks were poor, homeless and discriminated against. They were not given justice and this created social differences and divisions.
The same problem is faced by the Dalits in India.They are poor and landless. The Dalits face injustice and discrimination in at the hands of the upper castes.
The above is an example of one difference overlapping other differences, people of the same religion feel they belong to different communities.
Take another example : In Ireland, a Christian country, the division is because of religion between the Protestants and Catholics.
In Northern Ireland, if you are a Catholic you are bound to be poor and you may have been discriminated against. There have been conflicts between the two.
Cross-Cutting Differences
In Netherlands : Catholics and Protestants both can be either rich or poor, with the result they have never had any trouble. Unlike Ireland, there has never been any trouble in the Netherlands. There reason class and religion cut across each other.
Which kind of division is more dangerous?
Overlapping social differences. They can create deep social divisions.
Examples : (i) Led to ethnic war in Sri Lanka which has not yet ended. (ii) Led to the Partition of India in 1947.
Cross-cutting social differences are easier to handle and accommodate.
It is important to note here that social divisions of one kind or another exist in every country.
No country, big or small, has a homogeneous society, i.e., a society with similar kind of people and hardly any ethnic differences.
There is another reason - People from one region or country shift to another region or country (both within a country and another country) to seek better economic opportunities. These migrants create social differences and divisions.
RANGE OF OUTCOMES
1. (a) Violent Conflict
Example : Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.
(b) Reason : Ethno-religious with political fallout.
Example : Republic predominantly Catholic. Northern Ireland 53% Protestant, 44% Catholics. The Republic wanted them to unite.
(c) Parties : The Nationalists represented the Republic, the Unionists represented Northern
Ireland and wanted to remain within U.K.
Example : Violent war where hundreds were killed. Republic of Ireland fought with
Northern Ireland as well as with U.K.
Final Outcome : A peace treaty signed in 1998 which ended the armed struggle.
2. Yugoslavia also faced ethno-religious differences. They led to political competition. Civil war followed and Yugoslavia has been broken up now into seven independent nations, namely; Bosnia, Macedonia Croatia, Herzegovina, Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro.
Conclusion : Social divisions should not be allowed to influence the politics of a country. We have seen the result in our own country - Partition into India and Pakistan.
In a democracy, how do social divisions affect the people?
(i) Social divisions will be reflected in politics (Example : India)
(ii) Political parties will refer to these divisions.
(iii) Political parties would try to redress the grievances of minorities.
(iv) Voting is affected in most countries. People from one community prefer some parties more than the others.
(v) In some countries, there are parties that focus on one community only.
Factors that decide the outcomes of social divisions
(i) How do people see their identities? If people think they are Indians first, and then they are Bengali, Punjabi etc. or a religious or language group, then there will be no conflict. Trouble in Ireland was because they thought that first they were Catholics or Protestants and then Irish.
In Belgium, it was the opposite. First Belgians, then Dutch or French-speaking.
(ii) Peace remains if one community does not try to dominate the others. For example, in Sri Lanka, the demands of "only Sinhala" was at the cost of Tamil-speaking community. In Yugoslavia, each ethnic group made demands for itself only, with the result that the country was divided into six nations.
(iii) Depends on how the government reacts to the demands. If the rulers are willing to share power (as in Belgium) there is no threat to the unity of the country. But if suppressed in the name of national unity (as in Sri Lanka), it leads to violence.
Two African-American athletes, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, won the gold and bronze medal respectively in the 200 mt. race. For the medal ceremony, both of them wore no shoes and stood in their black socks. They were representing Black poverty, and racial discrimination against them in the USA. They also raised black-gloved clenched fists to symbolise Black Power. The athlete from Australia, Peter Norman, who won the silver medal, wore a human rights badge to declare his support to the two Americans.
The result of their actions- The Olympic Committee took back their medals for making a political statement and thus violating the Olympic spirit.
When they returned to USA, they had to face public criticism.
Peter Norman was also penalised by not being included in the next Olympic.
Origin of Social Differences
(i) Most of the social differences are not of our own making, they are based on an accident of birth. Our race, our colour, our religion, our gender or country of birth, are not chosen by us.
(ii) But some social differences are made by us only by choice. For example -
(i) Non-belief in God, or to follow a different religion, (ii) where and what to study, (iii) which profession to follow (iv) also choose the games or cultural activities we want to follow, etc.
Our choices lead to the formation of social groups.
(iii) It is not necessary that all social differences should lead to social divisions. People belonging to different social groups share differences and similarities, which cut across all political boundaries.
Important : If religion creates similarities, it can divide people over the issue of caste or sect (Catholic or Protestant, Brahmin or Scheduled Caste).
Rich and poor persons in the same family differ from each other and lack closeness to each other, for they feel they are different.
Overlapping and Cross-Cutting Differences
Why was there a social division in USA?
There was a division between the Whites and Blacks in USA because the Blacks were poor, homeless and discriminated against. They were not given justice and this created social differences and divisions.
The same problem is faced by the Dalits in India.They are poor and landless. The Dalits face injustice and discrimination in at the hands of the upper castes.
The above is an example of one difference overlapping other differences, people of the same religion feel they belong to different communities.
Take another example : In Ireland, a Christian country, the division is because of religion between the Protestants and Catholics.
In Northern Ireland, if you are a Catholic you are bound to be poor and you may have been discriminated against. There have been conflicts between the two.
Cross-Cutting Differences
In Netherlands : Catholics and Protestants both can be either rich or poor, with the result they have never had any trouble. Unlike Ireland, there has never been any trouble in the Netherlands. There reason class and religion cut across each other.
Which kind of division is more dangerous?
Overlapping social differences. They can create deep social divisions.
Examples : (i) Led to ethnic war in Sri Lanka which has not yet ended. (ii) Led to the Partition of India in 1947.
Cross-cutting social differences are easier to handle and accommodate.
It is important to note here that social divisions of one kind or another exist in every country.
No country, big or small, has a homogeneous society, i.e., a society with similar kind of people and hardly any ethnic differences.
There is another reason - People from one region or country shift to another region or country (both within a country and another country) to seek better economic opportunities. These migrants create social differences and divisions.
RANGE OF OUTCOMES
1. (a) Violent Conflict
Example : Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.
(b) Reason : Ethno-religious with political fallout.
Example : Republic predominantly Catholic. Northern Ireland 53% Protestant, 44% Catholics. The Republic wanted them to unite.
(c) Parties : The Nationalists represented the Republic, the Unionists represented Northern
Ireland and wanted to remain within U.K.
Example : Violent war where hundreds were killed. Republic of Ireland fought with
Northern Ireland as well as with U.K.
Final Outcome : A peace treaty signed in 1998 which ended the armed struggle.
2. Yugoslavia also faced ethno-religious differences. They led to political competition. Civil war followed and Yugoslavia has been broken up now into seven independent nations, namely; Bosnia, Macedonia Croatia, Herzegovina, Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro.
Conclusion : Social divisions should not be allowed to influence the politics of a country. We have seen the result in our own country - Partition into India and Pakistan.
In a democracy, how do social divisions affect the people?
(i) Social divisions will be reflected in politics (Example : India)
(ii) Political parties will refer to these divisions.
(iii) Political parties would try to redress the grievances of minorities.
(iv) Voting is affected in most countries. People from one community prefer some parties more than the others.
(v) In some countries, there are parties that focus on one community only.
Factors that decide the outcomes of social divisions
(i) How do people see their identities? If people think they are Indians first, and then they are Bengali, Punjabi etc. or a religious or language group, then there will be no conflict. Trouble in Ireland was because they thought that first they were Catholics or Protestants and then Irish.
In Belgium, it was the opposite. First Belgians, then Dutch or French-speaking.
(ii) Peace remains if one community does not try to dominate the others. For example, in Sri Lanka, the demands of "only Sinhala" was at the cost of Tamil-speaking community. In Yugoslavia, each ethnic group made demands for itself only, with the result that the country was divided into six nations.
(iii) Depends on how the government reacts to the demands. If the rulers are willing to share power (as in Belgium) there is no threat to the unity of the country. But if suppressed in the name of national unity (as in Sri Lanka), it leads to violence.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.