NCERT TEXTBOOK QUESTIONS
Q.1. Explain the reasons for the changes in clothing
patterns and materials in the eighteenth century.
Ans. After the 18th century, the colonisation of most of the
world by Europe, the spread of democratic ideals and the growth of an industrial society
completely changed the ways in which people thought about dress. People could use styles
and materials that were drawn from other cultures and locations. Western dress styles for men
were adopted worldwide.
Q.2. What were the sumptuary laws in France?
Ans. From 1294 to the time of the French Revolution in 1789,
the people of France
were expected
to strictly follow the sumptuary laws. The laws tried to
control the behaviour of those considered socially inferior, preventing them from wearing
certain clothes, consuming certain foods and beverages, and hunting game in certain areas.
Q.3. Give an example of any two examples of the ways in
which European dress codes were different from Indian dress codes.
Ans. European dress codes were different from Indian dress
codes. Let us take the example of the turban and the hat. The two headgears not only looked
different but also signified different things. The turban in India was not just for protection
from the heat but was a sign of respectability and could not be removed at will. In the
western tradition, the hat had to be removed before social superiors as a sign of respect.
The shoe is another example. The Indians took off their
shoes when they entered a sacred place. The British did not do so.
Q.4. In 1805, a British official, Benjamin Heyne, listed the
manufactures of Bangalore
which included the following :
(i) Women’s cloth of different musters and names
(ii) Coarse chintz
(iii) Muslins
(iv) Silk cloths.
Of the list, which kind of cloth would have definitely
fallen out of use in the early 1800s and why?
Ans. Muslin would have fallen out of use as machine cloth
had flooded the Indian markets and was cheaper. Muslin was expensive and hence was not used. In
fact, the Industrial Revolution brought about a complete change in which muslin cloth had no
place.
Q.5. Suggest reasons why women in nineteenth century India were
obliged to continue wearing traditional Indian dress even when men switched over
to the more convenient western clothing. What does this show about the position of
women in society?
Ans. Women in the 19th century India were obliged to continue
wearing traditional Indian dress even when men switched over to more convenient western
clothes. This clearly shows that women during that time were accorded a lower status than men
in society. They were not allowed to be aware of what was going on outside the house
and were confined within the four walls of their homes. Modernity and change were not for
them.
Q.6. Winston Churchill described Mahatma Gandhi as a
‘seditious Middle
Temple lawyer’ now ‘posing as a half naked fakir.’ What provoked such a comment and what does it tell you about
the symbolic strength of Mahatma Gandhi’s dress?
Ans. Mahatma Gandhi went to the Viceroy’s house clad in
a dhoti.
This signified the symbolic strength of his dress. It showed the pride he had for his
nation and its people, especially the peasants. It also signified how he identified with his
people and the strength he derived from them.
Q.7. Why did Mahatma Gandhi’s dream of clothing the nation
in khadi appeal only to some sections of Indians?
Ans. Mahatma Gandhi’s dream was to clothe the whole nation
in khadi. But it was not easy for everyone to follow in his footsteps. Not many could take to
a single peasant loincloth as he had. Some could not afford khadi which was expensive and
some preferred to be dressed in finer cloth of various colours and designs.
very helpful
ReplyDeletei like it
ReplyDelete